Hi Clément,

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> Tanix TX6 has a fixed regulator. As DVFS is instructed to change
> voltage to meet OPP table, the DVFS is not working as expected.
> 
> Avoid to introduce a new dedicated OPP Table where voltage are
> equals to the fixed regulator as it will only duplicate all the OPPs.
> Instead remove the fixed regulator so the DVFS framework will create
> dummy regulator and will have the same behavior.
> 
> Add some comments to explain this in the device-tree.
> 
> Reported-by: Piotr Oniszczuk <war...@o2.pl>
> Fixes: add1e27fb703 ("arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Enable CPU opp tables for 
> Tanix TX6")
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.c...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
> index be81330db14f..3e96fcb317ea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
> @@ -48,7 +48,15 @@
>  };
>  
>  &cpu0 {
> -     cpu-supply = <&reg_vdd_cpu_gpu>;
> +     /*
> +      * Don't specify the CPU regulator, as it's a fixed
> +      * regulator DVFS will not work as it is intructed
> +      * to reach a voltage which can't be reached.
> +      * Not specifying a regulator will create a dummy
> +      * regulator allowing all OPPs.
> +      *
> +      * cpu-supply = <&reg_vdd_cpu_gpu>;
> +      */

reg_vdd_cpu_gpu has 

    regulator-min-microvolt = <1135000>;
    regulator-max-microvolt = <1135000>;

top OPP is:

    opp@1800000000 {
            clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
            opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;

            opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1160000>;
            opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1100000>;
            opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1100000>;
    };

So I guess ignoring the voltage and not disabling this OPP may or may not work
based on SoC bin.

On Orange Pi One, there's a regulator that supports two voltages (that can't
support all the listed OPPs for H3), and cpufreq-dt can deal with that
automagically, if you specify OPP voltages via a tripplet of [prefered min max].
Kernell will log this in dmesg on boot:

[    0.672440] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1320000 maxuV: 
1320000, not supported by regulator
[    0.672454] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1104000000)
[    0.672523] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1320000 maxuV: 
1320000, not supported by regulator
[    0.672530] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1200000000)
[    0.672621] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1340000 maxuV: 
1340000, not supported by regulator
[    0.672628] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1296000000)
[    0.672712] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1400000 maxuV: 
1400000, not supported by regulator
[    0.672719] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1368000000)

And the list of available OPPs will be reduced at runtime to a supportable
set by the CPU regulator.

If you look at:

  
https://megous.com/git/linux/commit/?h=ths-5.7&id=d231770195913cf543c0cf9539deee2ecec06680

you'll see a bunch of OPPs for H3 that are specified as a range. So
for example if you want 480MHz, and your regulator can't produce
1.04V exactly, cpufreq will set the voltage to something supportable
in the range.

I think the proper fix is to fix the OPP table for H6, so that it uses
voltage ranges for each OPP and not a single fixed voltage, to support
boards that don't have the standard PMIC that goes with H6.

regards,
        o.

>  };
>  
>  &de {
> @@ -68,7 +76,13 @@
>  };
>  
>  &gpu {
> -     mali-supply = <&reg_vdd_cpu_gpu>;
> +     /*
> +      * Don't specify the GPU regulator, see comment
> +      * above for the CPU supply.
> +      *
> +      * mali-supply = <&reg_vdd_cpu_gpu>;
> +      */
> +
>       status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "linux-sunxi" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20200428142629.8950-1-peron.clem%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20200504122742.er2jd67bvrn2rfgp%40core.my.home.

Reply via email to