Since the CSI controller binding is getting a bit more complex due
to the addition of MIPI CSI-2 bridge support, make the ports node
explicit with the parallel and MIPI CSI-2 bridge ports.
This way, it's clear that the controller supports both parallel and
MIPI CSI-2 interface inputs and there's no confusion about their port
number.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkow...@bootlin.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
index c010b27fdb6a..3ce030f7e05d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
@@ -1062,7 +1062,17 @@ csi: camera@1cb0000 {
resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_CSI>;
status = "disabled";
- csi_in: port {
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ csi_in_parallel: port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ };
+
+ csi_in_mipi_csi2_bridge: port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ };
};
};
--
2.29.2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20201128142839.517949-9-paul.kocialkowski%40bootlin.com.
