On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:09:12AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> While comparing clocks between the H6 and H616, some of the M factor
> ranges were found to be wrong: the manual says they are only covering
> two bits [1:0], but our code had "5" in the number-of-bits field.
>
> By writing 0xff into that register in U-Boot and via FEL, it could be
> confirmed that bits [4:2] are indeed masked off, so the manual is right.
>
> Change to number of bits in the affected clock's description.
>
> Fixes: 524353ea480b ("clk: sunxi-ng: add support for the Allwinner H6 CCU")
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>Applied, thanks Maxime -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20210120095946.nljah6r3e4qhxdup%40gilmour.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
