On 2/8/21 7:20 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 12:31:34AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
>> On 2/8/21 12:28 AM, Samuel Holland wrote:
>>> In commit e5c02cf54154 ("i2c: mv64xxx: Add runtime PM support"), error
>>> pointers to optional clocks were replaced by NULL to simplify the resume
>>> callback implementation. However, that commit missed that the IS_ERR
>>> check in mv64xxx_of_config should be replaced with a NULL check. As a
>>> result, the check always passes, even for an invalid device tree.
>>
>> Sorry, please ignore this unrelated patch. I accidentally copied it to
>> the wrong directory before sending this series.
>
> Hi Samuel
>
> This patch looks correct. But i don't see it in i2c/for-next, where as
> e5c02cf54154 is. I just want to make sure it does not get lost...
Thanks for the concern. I had already sent it separately[0], to the
appropriate maintainers, so this submission was a duplicate.
Cheers,
Samuel
[0]:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> Andrew
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/089df4b2-8cd5-187a-55cf-0e558858a7d1%40sholland.org.
