Hello Uwe, On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 2:04 PM Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Hello Roman, > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:14:31PM +0200, Roman Beránek wrote: > > Correct, the output may stay in an active state. I only discovered this > > bug as I investigated a report of unreliable screen timeout. The period > > we use the PWM with is 50 us. > > What I don't like here is that the delay is quite coarse and might still > be too short. (Maybe I miss something, but consider the current period > is quite long, then you configure a short one and then disable. In this > case the inital long setting might still be active.)
The delay is calculated from the original period (cstate.period), not the one that was just written into PWM_CHx_PRD 2 lines above. > > Note: my apologies for the previous HTML message > > I didn't notice (because the message also contained a txt part). Another > thing to improve is to reply inline instead of top posting :-) Yeah, learning the conventions one reply at a time :-) Cheers, Roman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/CAL8eAtqBzUt6fP2nr-Ppg%2BqwhvKWk13A0P3%2Bhoe07F%2B9VXCvmA%40mail.gmail.com.
