----- The following recipients were processed by MTA c0mds01.prontomail.com ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Action: Failed; Status: 5.1.1 (bad destination mailbox address) Remote MTA c0mds01.prontomail.com: SMTP Diagnostic: 550 RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User unknown
Reporting-MTA: mdsc0mds01.prontomail.com Arrival-Date: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: Failed Status: 5.1.1 (bad destination mailbox address) Remote-MTA: ; c0mds01.prontomail.com Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User unknown
also sprach Gregory Huczynski: > I'm writing directly to video memory and only change one pointer to update a > frame; in contrast, in the first version, I have to do a memory copy to update > a frame. Any ideas why double buffering in video memory is actually slower? Perhaps your display routine is complicated and it is slower on the PCI bus than in memory. What is your system, what is it you draw, and what do the vga speed test demo programs show? The fastest way would be to have PCI bus mastering, IMO, but that hasn't been implemented yet. Mihai ------------------------------------------------------------------ Unsubscribe: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Body: unsubscribe linux-svgalib
