Gregory Huczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On a theoretical level, I thought that the second version would be faster, as 
> I'm writing directly to video memory and only change one pointer to update a 
> frame; in contrast, in the first version, I have to do a memory copy to update 
> a frame. Any ideas why double buffering in video memory is actually
> slower?

Do you use the same video modes?  Could you post the code somewhere,
or put it online?

-- 
Tijs van Bakel, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe:  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
              Body: unsubscribe linux-svgalib

Reply via email to