On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:56:14PM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > * Documents the review process in git, potentially giving some insight > into reasoning behind parts of the patch.
If this is an issue write better changelogs (with similar reasoning to why we don't merge incremental versions of the code either; besides without knowing what the old versions were it's generally not so useful). The lkml-reference: stuff looks a lot more useful if you really do want to do that as it'll show the older versions and discussions. > * Allows confirmation that the correct version was checked in. > (rarely an issue, but occasionally, albeit I haven't seen it in ASoC) Diff is useful for that (especially if people do what I do when I notice this stuff and manually strip the noise). > It's been mentioned a couple of times briefly on various lists before, > and while I'm sure it's not standard practice or anything, at least > there are some people supporting it. However, if you prefer, I'll try > to remember to move the changelog for ASoC patches. I've genuinely never seen this before except where it looked like an error on the part of the sender. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
