On 05/15/2013 04:27 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
> The Tegra114 is a quad cores SoC. Each core can be hotplugged including
> CPU0. The hotplug sequence can be controlled by setting event trigger in
> flow controller. Then the flow controller will take care all the power
> sequence that include CPU up and down.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile

> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC)     += sleep-tegra30.o

CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC also adds that to obj-y. Will including it
twice cause problems?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset-handler.S 
> b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset-handler.S

>   *     CPU boot vector when restarting the a CPU following
>   *     an LP2 transition. Also branched to by LP0 and LP1 resume after
>   *     re-enabling sdram.
> + *
> + *   r6: SoC ID << 8

I meant to ask in patch 1: Perhaps the macro could do a >>8 so that code
can compare directly against the SoC IDs instead of having to compare
against shifted values.

> +     tegra_check_soc_id TEGRA114, TEGRA_APB_MISC_BASE, r6, r7
> +     beq     no_cpu0_chk

Does that need a THUMB(it ...) added? Same elsewhere.

> +     cmp     r6, #(TEGRA114 <<8)

Needs a space after <<.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S 
> b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S

> @@ -45,12 +46,17 @@ ENDPROC(tegra30_hotplug_shutdown)
>   * and powergates it -- flags (in R0) indicate the request type.
>   * Must never be called for CPU 0.

That comment is wrong now, I think.

>       tst     r0, #TEGRA30_POWER_HOTPLUG_SHUTDOWN
> +     beq     flow_ctrl_setting_for_lp2
> +
> +     /* flow controller set up for hotplug */
> +     mov     r3, #FLOW_CTRL_WAITEVENT                @ For hotplug
> +     b       flow_ctrl_done
> +flow_ctrl_setting_for_lp2:
> +     /* flow controller set up for LP2 */
> +     cmp     r10, #(TEGRA30 << 8)
>       moveq   r3, #FLOW_CTRL_WAIT_FOR_INTERRUPT       @ For LP2

Do you need e.g. "movne r3, #0" or similar here? Otherwise, I think r3
ends up not being initialized.

> -     movne   r3, #FLOW_CTRL_WAITEVENT                @ For hotplug
> +flow_ctrl_done:
> +     cmp     r10, #(TEGRA30 << 8)
>       str     r3, [r2]

I wonder whether creating a separate tegra114_cpu_shutdown() wouldn't be
better, to avoid all the runtime conditional code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to