On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:56:34PM -0700, Vince Hsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/12/2014 02:23 AM, Allen Martin wrote:
> >> >+cbootimage_soc_config tegra132_config = {
> >> >+ .init_bad_block_table = t132_init_bad_block_table,
> >> >+ .set_dev_param = t132_set_dev_param,
> >> >+ .get_dev_param = t132_get_dev_param,
> >> >+ .set_sdram_param = t132_set_sdram_param,
> >> >+ .get_sdram_param = t132_get_sdram_param,
> >> >+ .setbl_param = t132_setbl_param,
> >> >+ .getbl_param = t132_getbl_param,
> >> >+ .set_value =
> >> >t132_bct_set_value,
> >> >+ .get_value =
> >> >t132_bct_get_value,
> >> >+ .set_data =
> >> >t132_bct_set_data,
> >> >+ .get_bct_size = t132_get_bct_size,
> >> >+ .set_mts_info = t132_set_mts_info,
> >> >+ .get_mts_info = t132_get_mts_info,
> >> >+ .token_supported =
> >> >t132_bct_token_supported,
> >> >+
> >> >+ .devtype_table = s_devtype_table_t132,
> >> >+ .sdmmc_data_width_table = s_sdmmc_data_width_table_t132,
> >> >+ .spi_clock_source_table = s_spi_clock_source_table_t132,
> >> >+ .nvboot_memory_type_table = s_nvboot_memory_type_table_t132,
> >> >+ .sdram_field_table =
> >> >s_sdram_field_table_t132,
> >> >+ .nand_table = 0,
> >> >+ .sdmmc_table = s_sdmmc_table_t132,
> >> >+ .spiflash_table = s_spiflash_table_t132,
> >> >+ .device_type_table =
> >> >s_device_type_table_t132,
> >> >+};
> >> >+
> > Since Tegra132 and Tegra124 are so similar, can we reuse the Tegra124
> > version of any of these to avoid the duplication?
> Some of these functions like setbl_param refer to the macros/definitions
> in nvboot_bct_txx.h. So maybe they look similar, actually they don't. If
> we want to generalize these functions, we might have to refactor
> nvboot_bct_txx.h and some more stuff. Can we leave it as is?
I can see how this could turn into a can of worms. I just seems like
a shame to have to duplicate so much code for a new SoC that's ~90% the
same as the previous SoC. Can the token tables be reused, or do they
have the same issue?
-Allen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html