On Wednesday 26 November 2014 21:18:03 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 November 2014 17:21:37 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > -
> > > + pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->pio,
> > > sys->io_offset);
> > > pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->mem,
> > > sys->mem_offset);
> > > pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->prefetch,
> > > sys->mem_offset);
> > >
> >
> > You don't set sys->io_offset anywhere, which is a bug if you have multiple
> > instances of the PCI host in one system. In my draft patch, I was setting
> > both io_offset and mem_offset for consistency, and while mem_offset would
> > in practice be always zero (as discussed on IRC), the io_offset in fact has
> > a realistic chance of being nonzero and you should definitely set it.
>
> I was going to do that in a follow-up patch since it isn't needed to fix
> this particular regression.
Makes sense, but then I think you can do the request_resource() and
pci_add_resource_offset() additions in the same follow-up patch as well,
and only change the computation in the regression fix.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
