On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:13:38PM +0000, David Ung wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexandre Courbot [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:30 PM > > To: David Ung; [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; Arto Merilainen; Terje Bergstrom > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] gpu: host1x: Reduce host1x job allocation size > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:39 AM, David Ung <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Alexandre Courbot [mailto:[email protected]] > > >> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 12:09 AM > > >> To: David Ung > > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Arto Merilainen; > > >> Terje Bergstrom > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] gpu: host1x: Reduce host1x job allocation > > >> size > > >> > > >> The series looks ok to me, the only problem I see is that we are > > >> lacking means to thoroughly test host1x patches across all the > > >> supported Tegra chips. > > >> > > >> Could you detail what kind of testing this patch series has > > >> undergone, and which chips/boards have been tested? > > > > > > Tested the host1x channel tests for T132 on A44. > > > Also ran Paul's EIMT set up which only tests booting kernel to console > > > for T20/T30/T114/T124 and QEMU > > > > Thierry, what do you think? > > > > I know we are lacking proper testing infrastructure for host1x, but these > > patches really looks harmless to me. > > > Thank you Alex for the review. > It would be good to have closure to this patchset.
We'll get closure on this once the testing infrastructure appears. I won't apply these patches before then. Thierry
pgp8R5fHbGJo2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
