* Thomas Renninger <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Most definitely. It's no accident that it took such a long time for this
> > issue
> > to be raised in the first place. It's a rare occurance -
>
> Do you agree that this occurance happened now and these events should get
> cleaned
> up before ARM and other archs make use of the broken interface?
>
> If not, discussing this further, is a big waste of time... and Jean would
> have to
> try to adapt his ARM code on the broken ABI...
The discussion seems to have died down somewhat. Please re-send to lkml the
latest
patches you have to remind everyone of the latest state of things - the merge
window
is getting near.
My only compatibility/ABI point is basically that it shouldnt break _existing_
tracepoints (and users thereof). If your latest bits meet that then it ought to
be a
good first step. You are free to (and encouraged to) introduce more complete
sets of
events.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
