On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:39:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 21:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > But instead of a global tracing ABI number, I would rather suggest > > one number per tracepoint subsystem (sched, power, etc...). > > > > Ideally it would be per event, but sometimes those events tend to be > > renamed or a whole tracepoint subsystem refactored (see workqueue > > lately). Hence it might be better per subsystem. > > What's wrong with what we have? the /format file is pretty unique to > function as a version number of you use a hash over it.
Yeah we could in fact use it to find if fields have been added, removed. Right, all in one that looks enough to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
