On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:18:48 +0800
Chen Ditang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Reads a wrong trace.dat file, the read_cpu_data() function returns a 
> failure, it will cause memory double free.
> 
> # ./trace-graph ../../trace.dat
> version = 6
> File possibly truncated. Need at least 18446744073709551614, but file size is 
> 3564371.
> *** Error in `./trace-graph': double free or corruption (fasttop): 
> 0x000000000262a6e0 ***
> ======= Backtrace: =========
> /lib64/libc.so.6[0x387b27cef8]
> ./trace-graph(kbuffer_free+0x18)[0x434f78]
> ./trace-graph(tracecmd_close+0xca)[0x432f55]
> ./trace-graph(tracecmd_open_fd+0x5d)[0x432e22]
> ./trace-graph(tracecmd_open+0x3c)[0x432e65]
> ./trace-graph(trace_graph+0x148)[0x40a685]
> ./trace-graph(main+0x20)[0x40adee]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x387b221b75]
> ./trace-graph[0x40a029]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ditang Chen <[email protected]>
> ---
>  trace-input.c | 16 ++++------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/trace-input.c b/trace-input.c
> index 6eef168..8493495 100644
> --- a/trace-input.c
> +++ b/trace-input.c
> @@ -1841,7 +1841,7 @@ static int read_cpu_data(struct tracecmd_input *handle)
>  
>               handle->cpu_data[cpu].kbuf = kbuffer_alloc(long_size, endian);
>               if (!handle->cpu_data[cpu].kbuf)
> -                     goto out_free;
> +                     return -1;
>               if (pevent->old_format)
>                       kbuffer_set_old_format(handle->cpu_data[cpu].kbuf);
>  
> @@ -1857,22 +1857,14 @@ static int read_cpu_data(struct tracecmd_input 
> *handle)
>                               "Need at least %llu, but file size is %zu.\n",
>                               offset + size, handle->total_file_size);
>                       errno = EINVAL;
> -                     goto out_free;
> +                     return -1;
>               }
>  
>               if (init_cpu(handle, cpu))
> -                     goto out_free;
> +                     return -1;
>       }
>  
>       return 0;
> -
> - out_free:
> -     for ( ; cpu >= 0; cpu--) {
> -             free_page(handle, cpu);
> -             kbuffer_free(handle->cpu_data[cpu].kbuf);

These frees are still required. But you did uncover a real bug.
Though, the real fix to it is to init kbuf back to NULL:

        kbuffer_free(handle->cpu_data[cpu].kbuf);
        handle->cpu_data[cpu].kbuf = NULL;

Because free() and all the other freeing functions should allow for
NULL to be passed, and it should then be ignored.

-- Steve

> -     }
> -     return -1;
> -
>  }
>  
>  static int read_data_and_size(struct tracecmd_input *handle,
> @@ -2209,7 +2201,7 @@ void tracecmd_close(struct tracecmd_input *handle)
>               /* The tracecmd_peek_data may have cached a record */
>               free_next(handle, cpu);
>               free_page(handle, cpu);
> -             if (handle->cpu_data) {
> +             if (handle->cpu_data && handle->cpu_data[cpu].kbuf) {
>                       kbuffer_free(handle->cpu_data[cpu].kbuf);
>  
>                       if (!list_empty(&handle->cpu_data[cpu].pages))

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to