On 17/05/2022 14:02, Luck, Tony wrote: >> Tony / Dinh - can I just *skip* this notifier *if kdump* is set or else >> we run the code as-is? Does that make sense to you? > > The "skip" option sounds like it needs some special flag associated with > an entry on the notifier chain. But there are other notifier chains ... so > that > sounds messy to me. > > Just all the notifiers in priority order. If any want to take different > actions > based on kdump status, change the code. That seems more flexible than > an "all or nothing" approach by skipping. > > -Tony
I guess I've expressed myself in a poor way - sorry! What I'm planning to do in the altera_edac notifier is: if (kdump_is_set) return; /* regular code */ In other words: if the kdump is set, this notifier will be effectively a nop (although it's gonna be called). Lemme know your thoughts Tony, if that makes sense. Thanks, Guilherme _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
