On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 14:20 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Yes but you need to schedule for the interrupt, and you don't > necessarily know what 'current time' is at interrupt time. > > So let's say you have "something" that's scheduled to run at times > - 1000 > - 2000 > - 3000 > > and free-until is 10000 or something high. >
It can also happen without free-until, then it just depends which one of the two - they're running in parallel now (linux doing time-travel interrupt handling and adding the event, the other thing continuing to schedule and doing the next entry) - asks the controller first. johannes _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
