On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 10:19 PM Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/5/25 4:26 PM, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig b/arch/um/Kconfig
> > index 9083bfdb773..8d14c8fc2cd 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ menu "UML-specific options"
> > config UML
> > bool
> > default y
> > + select ARCH_DEFER_KASAN
>
> select ARCH_DEFER_KASAN if STATIC_LINK
As pointed out in commit 5b301409e8bc("UML: add support for KASAN
under x86_64"),
: Also note that, while UML supports both KASAN in inline mode
(CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE)
: and static linking (CONFIG_STATIC_LINK), it does not support both at
the same time.
I've tested that for UML,
ARCH_DEFER_KASAN works if STATIC_LINK && KASAN_OUTLINE
ARCH_DEFER_KASAN works if KASAN_INLINE && !STATIC_LINK
ARCH_DEFER_KASAN if STATIC_LINK, and KASAN_INLINE=y by default from defconfig
crashes with SEGFAULT here (I didn't understand what it is, I think
the main() constructors
is not prepared in UML):
► 0 0x609d6f87 strlen+43
1 0x60a20db0 _dl_new_object+48
2 0x60a24627 _dl_non_dynamic_init+103
3 0x60a25f9a __libc_init_first+42
4 0x609eb6b2 __libc_start_main_impl+2434
5 0x6004a025 _start+37
Since this is the case only for UML, AFAIU, I don't think we want to change
conditions in lib/Kconfig.kasan. Shall I leave UML Kconfig as it is? e.g.
select ARCH_DEFER_KASAN
>
> > select ARCH_WANTS_DYNAMIC_TASK_STRUCT
> > select ARCH_HAS_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
> > select ARCH_HAS_CPU_FINALIZE_INIT
> > diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/kasan.h b/arch/um/include/asm/kasan.h
> > index f97bb1f7b85..81bcdc0f962 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/include/asm/kasan.h
> > +++ b/arch/um/include/asm/kasan.h
> > @@ -24,11 +24,6 @@
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> > void kasan_init(void);
> > -extern int kasan_um_is_ready;
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_LINK
> > -#define kasan_arch_is_ready() (kasan_um_is_ready)
> > -#endif
> > #else
> > static inline void kasan_init(void) { }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_KASAN */
