On Fri, 2025-09-19 at 09:03 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > > This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Why would we even want to build > > PCI on NOMMU-UML if PCI in general is dependent on MMU now? > > > > It's not like ARCH=um with PCI and NOMMU has any value even for testing > > if such a configuration cannot exist in reality? > > totally understand your point. > > now I see that we don't have to have this work around by using > --kconfig_add option to kunit.py. > > # like --kconfig_add CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO=n (in addition to > --kconfig_add CONFIG_MMU=n).
That's not what I mean. I think it should be made impossible to build the broken code. The problem is probably UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO selecting UML_PCI selecting various PCI code, but nothing depends on PCI in the first place. Which it should, then? johannes
