On 22.05.26 20:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2026, at 17:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 22.05.26 16:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

--- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
@@ -10,8 +10,7 @@ config XEN
        select X86_HV_CALLBACK_VECTOR
        select HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS
        depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && X86_PAE)
-       depends on X86_64 || (X86_GENERIC || MPENTIUM4 || MATOM)
-       depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_TSC
+       depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC

This is problematic. See commit 93cd05976498.

Maybe use "depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT >= 6" instead?

After patch 6/8, this is always true, so I suppose it would
if that came first, right?

Yes, agreed.


On a related note, are there still remaining Xen users on new
32-bit guest kernels? I understand that one could still run
modern kernels on 32-bit Xen-4.2 (EOL in 2015), and that 64-bit
Xen still supports older 32-bit guest operating systems for
compatibility, but I'm not sure if there is any reason to
legitimately run a 32-bit linux-7.x kernel on a 64-bit Xen
instead of running a better supported 64-bit guest kernel.

From the logical point of view I totally agree. OTOH users are humans,
so they might not agree with that. ;-)


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to