On 22.05.26 20:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2026, at 17:46, Juergen Gross wrote:On 22.05.26 16:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:--- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig @@ -10,8 +10,7 @@ config XEN select X86_HV_CALLBACK_VECTOR select HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && X86_PAE) - depends on X86_64 || (X86_GENERIC || MPENTIUM4 || MATOM) - depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_TSC + depends on X86_LOCAL_APICThis is problematic. See commit 93cd05976498. Maybe use "depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT >= 6" instead?After patch 6/8, this is always true, so I suppose it would if that came first, right?
Yes, agreed.
On a related note, are there still remaining Xen users on new 32-bit guest kernels? I understand that one could still run modern kernels on 32-bit Xen-4.2 (EOL in 2015), and that 64-bit Xen still supports older 32-bit guest operating systems for compatibility, but I'm not sure if there is any reason to legitimately run a 32-bit linux-7.x kernel on a 64-bit Xen instead of running a better supported 64-bit guest kernel.
From the logical point of view I totally agree. OTOH users are humans, so they might not agree with that. ;-) Juergen
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
