does it reproduce with the current hotplug scripts?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb.agent ought to report "Hub driver already
loaded." for hub
devices?
> What was the decision on this? I don't recall
> seeing agreement on a solution and implementation.
>
> Thanks,
> Miles
>
> David Brownell wrote:
>
> > Two chunks of kernel code disagree on how hubs should be reported.
> >
> > The call_policy() code says they're just like other class devices, while
> > the modutils metadata in hub.c says they're really per-interface devices.
> > Those each tell different parts of the story to the policy agent code, and
> > confuse policy agents that can't use the extra data usbdevfs exposes
> > (maybe it's not configured).
> >
> > I'd change the hub code to match based on device class (unless the usb
> > 2.0 spec doesn't guarantee hubs use device class 9?) and will add a
> > "usb.handmap" entry to work around this for kernels that don't do that.
> >
> > - Dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
