Hello,
On 26-May-01 Alan Cox wrote:
>> While I agree that in-kernel format conversion code (between standard V4L
>> formats) should be removed *eventually*, tearing it out in the middle of
>> a
>> stable kernel series without warning does a great disservice to many
>> users. This
>
> I didnt "tear it out". I vetoed it going in
Correction; you (effectively) vetoed my driver; all the others did go in,
appearantly without much of a comment. Now weīre having a problem,
>> clear about this, and post a message on the V4L list saying "App
>> developers: you
>> have until 2.4.8 to get your shit together". That is good and fair
>> project
>> management; use of heavy-handed quasi-punitive measures just to prove a
>> point isn't.
>
> I've explained this repeatedly on the list going back years.
At the risk of being off-topic, why didnīt anybody do anything about it
then? Are they deaf, donīt listen to you, or are they simply complacent?
- Nemosoft
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try SorceryNet! One of the best IRC-networks around! irc.sorcery.net:9000
URL: never IRC: nemosoft IscaBBS (bbs.isca.uiowa.edu): Nemosoft
>> Never mind the daylight <<
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
