On Friday, 29. June 2001 13:08, you wrote:
> > From: Franz Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:39:17 +0100
> >
> > -the motherboard: I tried two 486 based motherboards with the same
>
> result,
>
> I suspect it's the board, until proven wrong. My expirience
> suggests that PCI in 486s was often not-quite-standard.
> Some of these designs were conceived before PCI 1.0 was
> published (using Intel's NDAs). I saw all sorts of bizzare
> things, such as silent corruptions...
>
> Missing interrupts are hardly possible though, interrupt
> pins on PCI are very very simple. However, OHCI sequensor
> can easily crash if it encounters a PCI error or any
> situation on the bus that it is not prepared to deal with.
> In that case it will cease interrupting :)
>
> Most of OHCI silicon was never tested with a PCI implementation
> lower than 2.0.
>
> -- Pete
Thank you for the prompt answer, but there a two reasons, why this might not
be the reason for all that trouble.
First, one of the tested board's is a modern 486 based System on Chip
architecture.
Second, why does work using W*98 ?
Nevertheless, the proof for your assumption might be supplied, if someone has
a 486 with a working USB camera streaming with ov511 or cpia.
Franz
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
