> Some USB APIs will be trouble, since they don't pass an URB > or explicit mem_flags value down. Were you thinking of just > making it all use SLAB_NOIO? That might cause a few more > "out of memory" error reports in places it's not necessary (khubd > as one example). But I'm not sure making usb_control_msg() and > all its callers (and their callers ... :) take a new mem_flags parameter > would be a reasonable API change. Would it be better to make the memory type to use a device flag on the device we are throwing the urb at ? _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... David Brownell
- Fwd: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swap... Matthew Dharm