> Wouldn't it be better to add a global spinlock for the v4l devices
> table? Is there a reason that it has to be the BKL?
A spinlock would be possible, too. Linus did _not_ accept a patch to do this
in times of 2.4.0-preX. Given that v4l'll probably be replaced with v4l2 and
disconnect is not exactly a common event and open() on a v4l device is
neither I see no reason to bother.
Regards
Oliver
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
