On Don, 27 Sep 2001, Nemosoft Unv. wrote:
> Personally, I say the above piece of code is faulty. Refering to a
> pointer after you appearently deleted it, is just very bad programming
> practice.
>
> I�d say, fix the usb-uhci file, and do a quick run on all other instances
> of list_del. I think most programmers got it right, or 2.4.10 kernels would
> be coming down all over the planet.
Anybody has already used the reverse patch:
--- v2.4.10/linux/include/linux/list.h Fri Feb 16 16:06:17 2001
+++ linux/include/linux/list.h Sun Sep 23 10:31:02 2001
@@ -90,6 +92,7 @@
static __inline__ void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
{
__list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
- entry->next = entry->prev = 0;
}
/**
And can tell us if it works?
Best wishes
Norbert
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
University of Technology Vienna, Austria gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TEGUCIGALPA (n.)
An embarrassing mistake arising out of confusing the shape of
something rather rude with something perfectly ordinary when groping
for it in the darkness. A common example of a tegucigalpa is when a
woman pulls a packet of Tampax out of her bag and offers them around
under the impression that it is a carton of cigarettes.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
