On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 02:28:18PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > Not that very many people access that field; it's > ignored by "hub.c" and (as I seem to recall) is > there only for backwards compat with the very > earliest USB 1.0 hubs. (USB 1.1 fixed the bits > to be all ones.) In the kernel, only virtual root > hubs touch that field; and user mode code can > see it through usbdevfs, but it should avoid it.
ah, thanks for the explaination. > > And I am the one to blame for that update from the -ac tree. > > Or maybe me, because after I carefully removed that stuff > from the AC tree for the 2.4.10 integration of usb 2.0 > framework code into Linus' tree, I didn't submit a patch to > Alan to obliterate it from his tree. Having two trees just > sucks totally ... :) That's why there is really only 1 tree now. The differences between the -ac and Linus USB trees are _very_ small. And I want to see it stay that way :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
