Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:53:16AM +1100, Brad Hards wrote: > > A few other classes that no-one seems to care about (like common class, or the > > eternal favourite of USBDI:) > > http://www.usb.org/developers/data/devclass/usbdi10.pdf > > The USBDI class is to try to help us write drivers, not a type of device > class. And since almost everyone agrees that UDI will not happen in the > kernel, we don't have to worry about it :) I agree that difference between USBDI as driver infrastructure and USBDI as a driver isn't worth worrying about :)
> We also don't really have a Firmware download spec driver yet, but I > don't see a need for it at this time. http://at76c503a.sourceforge.net has the firmware downloader (with some extra code for the particular device), although the bonus stuff is quite well seperated from the spec stuff. We didn't, however, implement the upload stuff. Nor did we copy out that obscurity of a checksum routine :) Brad _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
