Am Freitag, 7. Dezember 2001 01:21 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 01:11:34AM +0100, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Ok I did not searched this far. But this way you also change the nodes
> > for USB hard-discs, net-interfaces, ... to 666 - the same insecure as my
> > find solotion ...
>
> I was making a simple script, to match your simple defvsd line. Yes,
> you can (and should) make this more complex. See the linux-hotplug
> mailing list for a recent discussion by the gphoto developers about
> this very problem.
>
> > OK. Might be well for backward-compatibility - but the devfs solution
> > would be a very nice option.
>
> Will not happen.
Well, he still has a point. There are two subsystems with widly overlapping
functions. I must say, I feel this is not good. Yet, I have no clue what to
do.
Any ideas ?
Regards
Oliver
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
