On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, David Brownell wrote: > > I am using such a workaround for Nomad II and it is fine. > > hotplugger checks that the device is Nomad II and then unprotects it. > > So you really don't care which Nomad you download the > MP3s to?? I'm surprised.
Hard to believe, considering zillions of Nomads II I got, but true. > Or is the issue really that for > this particular application, your application has the "which > device is which" logic? Not all applications can, you know. No. Application takes the first Nomad II it finds. But more seriously we were not talking about which is which but about whether the rights given for access to different, let's say, Nomads should be different. In my opinion if user is allowed to access one Nomad - he/she should be allowed to access any - thus, from the point of security, it does not matter which Nomad is which. For me this is a general rule. Of course if the device contains some kind of rights control, as for example usb-storage with ext2 (Nomad uses FAT12), they should be respected-but this is different level. So for me rights granted on the VendorId:ProductId basis sound fine. Best Regards, Jacek _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
