> but anyway, why limit usbdevfs to only devices which don't have kernel > drivers? the end user should be able to decide what should drive a > certain device, right?
That's a familiar issue. Even if there's a kernel driver for one interface, a user mode one might be appropriate for a different interface. (I usually think it's a design bug if an "end user" even needs to know about a driver, but I read that comment as being about the application developer, not the end user.) And then there's that example of a device that's standard, but uses vendor-specific management hooks to establish certain non-essential (but desired :) capabilities. - Dave _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
