On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:43:18AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Duncan's point was accurate: that locking is not an issue with > > drivers accessed through char or block special files. On the > > other hand, those would use the "regular" ioctl route, so it'd not > > normally be an issue. (Except for stuff like "what's your major/minor?", > > which has been needed to find what /dev node matches a given > > new USB device.) > > So can we let driverfs do that job and remove the ioctl ?
Not yet :) Let's see how driverfs and the struct driver changes get incorporated into the tree first. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
