On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 01:29:19PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > Looks like what the hub driver does, and discards. I'd like to see > exactly one solution for that in the USB subsystem, so there aren't > a variety of conventions for such names.
I agree, patches anyone? :) > Likewise, but in that case I think the power management is going > to make it show up through "driverfs" with hubs as explicit nodes > in the fs tree. > > My current thought there is that USB through "driverfs" will likely > be different from USB through "usbfs". They will be totally different. usbfs will be used as it is today, to access USB data by userspace drivers. Possibly the "devices" and "drivers" file might move over to driverfs, but that's only a guess. driverfs is for the bus topologies, and specific driver information. See Pat's documentation for more information. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
