On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:43:53PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > What I want to do is have a robust way to tell EHCI not to interrupt > for most of the queued transfers. It's not as simple as I'd hoped, since > there's a common case where the HC has cached some transfer > data that the queue append must update. If it's done that, it needs > to be corrected asynchronously. (Interrupt or timer.) In other words, it would be easier if the HCD knew, in advance, that there were multiple URBs coming, yes?
I hate to really belabor the point, but it you took a scatter-gather list
directly, you'd have all the information you could want/need all in one
place at one time.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
Hey, has anyone seen the Microsoft sales guy? It's his feeding time...
-- Mike
User Friendly, 4/17/1998
msg03726/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
