Can't hurt, but the second patch segment will conflict
since the USB_ST_* is gone in 2.5 (obvious fix).

Assuming the "usb-ohci" goes away in 2.5.4 (?) then
the patch I'll send you for "ohci-hcd" will suffice.

- Dave


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Roman Weissgaerber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: PATCH (2.4.17) ohci and unlink-in-completion


> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:32:48PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > This fixes the problem Stuart reported, where interrupt urbs
> > couldn't be unlinked from their completion handlers, and it
> > also makes OHCI return the correct status code for async
> > unlink requests (-EINPROGRESS not zero).
> 
> Should I also add this to the 2.5 tree?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 


_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to