Greg KH wrote: > > With the recent lists of what people are going to be wanting to do in > the 2.5 kernel happening right now on the linux-kernel mailing list, I > remembered that I had wanted to summarise our own thread on the same > topic: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=100656721000001 > > So I knocked together a small 2.5 todo list, and placed it here: > http://www.linux-usb.org/2.5_todo.html
Am Samstag 24 November 2001 04:00 schrieb David Brownell: [...] > does the new kernel build toolset kick in, for example? And I > was rather intrigued by some of those notions of cleaning up the > device tree for power management... some of that should fit into > the hub work, and give us a physical device naming system that's > "stable" unless the USB tree is recabled. (Unlike the device > address scheme, which changes all the time.) Physical device naming was in the original thread (see above) but not explicitly in the todo list. This is a pretty important feature for embedded apps, esp. those that can be reconfigured. Among other things, we use USB serial chips (FTDI) for a couple of projects. Not having a consistent ttyS to connect to is a problem. For now we are ignoring the problem. Eventually I will have to do some sort of a hack with devfs (or something like that) so that each node has a consistant name. Cheers! Ty -- Tyson D Sawyer iRobot Corporation Senior Systems Engineer Military Systems Division [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robots for the Real World 603-532-6900 ext 206 http://www.irobot.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
