GFP_* is excessively cryptic, and it doesn't account for the slightly more meaningful SLAB_* synonyms ... :)
Actually, since td_alloc() is always SLAB_ATOMIC (artifact of locking structure) it won't need to change in these patches -- though if that locking ever gets improved, that should change. - Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Neukum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Roman Weissgaerber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 3:12 PM Subject: Re: patch to usb-ohci for gfp fields > On Sunday 03 February 2002 20:17, David Brownell wrote: > > Roman -- > > > > > hm, I think the allocation of the TDs has to be changed too. > > > > Yes. And I'd rather see a more mnemonic name than "gfp", > > perhaps "mem_flags" since that's their role. > > Doesn't gfp remind you of GFP_KERNEL, GFP_ATOMIC ... ? > > Regards > Oliver _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
