Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > From: Lars Doelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 01:08:29 +0100
> 
> >[...]
> > There is some Linux support for IEEE 1284.4 underway, but until this is 
> > working and integrated, i think one should better disable accepting these 
> > protocols, as it would never work in the moment.
> 
> David Paschal swears that it would break some other hardware,
> check this thread:
>  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=99662991400004&r=1&w=2
> Also this:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50218
> 
> BTW, I fail to understand David's position. He wrote a patch,

My "position" is as follows:

1. Many HP USB printers (mostly multi-function peripherals, see
http://hpoj.sourceforge.net/suplist.shtml, but also the LaserJet 1200 and
2200) advertise 7/1/3, 7/1/2, and 7/1/1 alternate settings, in that order.
7/1/3 is for the 1284.4 protocol, to be able to get to all the functions
on the peripheral, whereas 7/1/2 and 7/1/1 are for printing only.
Also, some HP USB printers, such as some DeskJets and PhotoSmart printers,
support a vendor-specific command to switch 7/1/2 from a raw print
interface to an MLC interface (the predecessor to 1284.4).

2. My user-mode 1284.4 driver for the HP OfficeJet Linux driver project
(http://hpoj.sourceforge.net) depends on being able to get to the 7/1/3
alternate setting.  Until now it has taken advantage of the printer.c
"bug" where it binds to the first bidirectional interface it finds, which
due to the enumeration order happens to be 7/1/3.  Of course, this "bug"
is problematic for users who want to be able to print directly to
/dev/usb/lp0.  (Note that this 1284.4 driver is working quite well already,
but since it's a user-mode component I intend to keep it as part of the
hpoj package rather than integrating it with the kernel.)

3. printer.c needs to be changed to bind to 7/1/2 by default, but for the
sake of the hpoj project, there needs to be a way to override this default
and bind to 7/1/3.  Your (Pete's) printer.c version that shipped with
RedHat 7.2 was a reasonable short-term solution, which provided a
command-line option to change the default from 7/1/2 to 7/1/whatever.
However, in the interest of maximum ease-of-use, there needs to be a
more automated and transparent method of doing the switch.

4. I developed a patch which adds several ioctls to resolve the above issues
as well as to provide user-mode access to more information about the
peripheral, including a linkage to the corresponding /proc/bus/usb/xx/yy
file.  I also noticed and fixed an apparent array overflow in usblp_probe
when exceeding the maximum number of connected USB printers (I may have
neglected to mention this previously).

> but then he failed to advocate it completely. Patches do not
> get applied to Greg's tree by magic.

Admittedly I was a bit soft-spoken originally, because I'm not a hard-core
kernel hacker and I didn't want to accidentally step on somebody's toes
by saying or doing the wrong thing.  But in what way did you think I
"failed to advocate it completely"?  Over the course of several e-mail
exchanges I think I explained my position (see above points) and eventually
got my patch into what I was led to believe was an acceptable form for
inclusion.  On December 22 I submitted my (presumably) "final" version to
Greg (the USB maintainer) and Vojtech (the printer.c maintainer) with a
CC to this list and politely requested that it be incorporated.  It
apparently was dropped, because it didn't get incorporated and I never
got any comments from either of them or anybody else.  Perhaps the
Christmas holidays were to blame, so I'll try again in a separate message
now that I've had a chance to merge in Oliver Neukum's recent changes
for 2.5 which were subsequently accepted with no problem.  I'll also watch
the kernel prepatches more closely and retry after a while if I don't see
it get incorporated with no explanation.

David


_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to