On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:20:30PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > I'm likewise puzzled by this. Were these devices that worked > previously? If so it'd seem to be the kernel "delay" patch > that's at fault somehow. And if not, it'd seem like that "delay" > patch doesn't work quite well enough on those devices (which > might be more marginal than it seems at first). > > It doesn't make sense to me that if more delays are added in > the kernel code, userland needs to see even more.
I agree, but Olaf and others prove that this works. I'm more puzzled why usbmodules is needing to talk to a device. I thought usbmodules was only for cold-plug stuff. Have any ideas? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
