On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Greg KH wrote: > Yes it does. I was thinking that this would be the same as moving the > linking order up higher (like had been proposed in the past) but didn't > realize when subsys_initcall() was called. I tested your patch out and > liked how it works.
Good ;-) > But this doesn't solve the same problem you will have in the 2.2 or 2.4 > kernels with your driver, correct? Well, the driver isn't in 2.2, and for 2.4 I'll move ISDN behind USB in the link order, that should work - noone else cares for ISDN having initialized before it. Thanks, --Kai _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
