Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > ... > > > Does "uhci" oops too? > ... > > For now, I was just probing to know if other people have > managed that or not.
I have "uhci" and "usb-ohci" (currently 2.4.19pre4, no problems with older kernels, too): mc:~ # lsmod ... usb-ohci 17696 0 (unused) usbmouse 1760 0 (unused) input 3136 0 [mousedev hid usbmouse evdev] usbcore 55232 1 [usb-ohci hid usbmouse uhci] uhci 23848 0 (unused) Mouse on UHCI, scanner on OHCI. Having "uhci" and "usb-uhci" _at equal rights_ in the kernel is BAD. This distracts people from fixing either. Does the USB team have any plans to rectify this situation ? It would be fine if there is consensus propagated which driver is preferred. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
