> Why not? What's wrong with 2.5? In fact, that's where all new work > should be going on right now, not the 2.4 tree.
The pressure to stay with stable kernels is simply too strong. If you develop for unstable series, you must track a quickly changing codebase, and this saps the time and effort which could be used productively. Not to mention data integrity concerns. A number of projects, small and big, were developed on stable series. For instance, s390 was merged into 2.2 first. I did ymfpci for 2.2 first. I do all current development on 2.4. I see a problem with that, but I do not see a solution. Greg does well to resist, I suppose. Perhaps, UML might be helpful. -- Pete _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
