Greg asked: > Is there any reason this patch can't be applied to 2.5 instead, and then > to 2.4 after it's proven itself?
Which seems like a reasonable question, although given the known problems with error handling in usb-storage, I'd agree with also getting such stuff into 2.4 ASAP once it checks out. "Proven" is a bit subjective, anyway! :) Matt commented: > The reason I dropped you this patch is that the next few, which radically > fix the error handling (abort, reset, etc) logic depends on this. I know > smaller patches are preferred over larger ones. Is that whole patch series ready to go now? Maybe it'd be better to submit the whole series at once. On the other hand, "radical" fixes do seem more appropriate to 2.5 just now... - Dave _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
