On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:57:50AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > In terms of the "priority" model I'd put "classes" above "misc" > and below any functionally defined directories ... to my thought, > it just recognizes that they're a slightly less random grouping, > more significant than "misc" (because of USB-IF blessing) but > where there also aren't enough product-level variances to need > individual directories (like storage). > > The bulk of the Linux source tree is functionally organized, > not sorted by what some vendor group (USB-IF in this case) > happened to deliver (or not). > > That'd change "net/cdc-ether.[hc]". Of course, if the rest of the > Linux hierarchy were cleanly categorized, either "media" would > be "video", or it'd include "sound" ... there are always glitches > in naming schemes! :)
In thinking about this a lot more this morning, and Oliver's comments, I agree. class/ should be a catch-all for drivers that would have fallen into misc/. So this leaves only 4 drivers in class/, but that's ok with me :) I'll rework this again and post my results in a little bit. > Or if you don't run bitkeeper: > > >http://linuxusb.bkbits.net:8080/dir_move-2.5/src/drivers/usb?nav=index.html|src/.|src/drivers Ah, thanks for including this. Probably much faster than sucking down the whole tree even for those with bitkeeper. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
