On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:56AM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:52:37AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > 
> > Furthermore subsubsystem deserve their own directories.
> > serial and storage deserve their own directories independent of class.
> > As do input, net and media. Actually scanner as a directory has little
> > use, as there's little internal relationship. You'd be better of putting
> > them into misc.
> 
> I have to second this. The acm.c code is much closer to serial code than
> for example to printer.c, and I think that most of the acm.c code will
> be merged into the usbserial framework, to make things simpler.

I'd be glad to do this merge if you don't mind.  I didn't know you
thought the acm driver should be part of the usb-serial subsystem (I
agree it should be, and lots of other people have asked me about it in
the past.)

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to