On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:10:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:56AM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:52:37AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > > > Furthermore subsubsystem deserve their own directories. > > > serial and storage deserve their own directories independent of class. > > > As do input, net and media. Actually scanner as a directory has little > > > use, as there's little internal relationship. You'd be better of putting > > > them into misc. > > > > I have to second this. The acm.c code is much closer to serial code than > > for example to printer.c, and I think that most of the acm.c code will > > be merged into the usbserial framework, to make things simpler. > > I'd be glad to do this merge if you don't mind. I didn't know you > thought the acm driver should be part of the usb-serial subsystem (I > agree it should be, and lots of other people have asked me about it in > the past.)
Go ahead. It'll make things more consistent, and some code can also go away, which is always good. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
