> That said, target or client or anything else distinctive sounds fine
> too. I'm just partial to the spec-derived-naming idea. (Although I
> really wish the USB spec folks could have come up with two names that
> were more descriptively different...)
Why you do you want to derive a name from the specs ?
Someone who has read them will no what is refered to
whatever we name it. The significance of a the name
is important to those who look into usb code occasionaly.
These typically haven't read the spec.
Regards
Oliver
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
