On Mon, May 13, 2002, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, since 0 is not an illegal value as specified in the USB spec, I > > think we should do this check in the usb_submit_urb() call, not force it > > to be duplicated in all host drivers. > > In fact there are a lot of checks in the hcd framework > already -- hcd.c has hcd_submit_urb() checking quite > a lot more than that. In 2.5 I'd expect that to be the > place such common code lands.
If the plan is to make all of the HCD's use hcd.c, then why do we have hcd_submit_urb and usb_submit_urb? Seems kind of superfluous to me. We should be able to move a variety of checks into usb_submit_urb. JE _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
