On Thu, 16 May 2002 08:12, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 16 May 2002, Brad Hards wrote: > | On Thu, 16 May 2002 03:09, Curran, Dominic wrote: > | > Hi > | > > | > A couple of weeks ago a question was asked about a USB Snoop like util > | > for Linux. > | > > | > The answer that came back was use 'cf modinfo'. > | > | It isn't a linux thing. Its a standard abbreviation, but I left out a . > | mark It should have been (cf. modinfo). The (cf. ) part means "see for". > | I was trying to tell you that you can get information about debugging > | options on a module, using a tool called "modinfo". > > No, man, it's Latin for "compare." Right you are. My error. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn1.7.1?stage=1&word=cf.
> Maybe 'man modinfo' would have been a little better. Yeah man :-) -- http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
