> Don't confuse your implementation of sohci_free_dev (which needs to be > called in a thread context)
Actually it's most likely from either Roman, Linus, or one "Gregory P Smith". (As I think I've pointed out before.) Or maybe someone else. FWIW I just looked at the 2.2.8 (!) USB stack, which while it's quite ancient was the seed of today's much more mature code. The bus deallocate() method was called in thread context even that far back. Looks like the bug that it sometimes _wasn't_ got added later. :) > from the requirements of the hardware > (triggering the start of an unlink). I certainly didn't, but then that's not all that's going on either so I wouldn't have been tempted to confuse them. - Dave _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
